Precedent-setting final judgment on the instrumentally initiated Fiscal Penal Code
Case study
Tax
The Tax-Litigation team at ALTO obtained for one of our Clients a precedent-setting and final judgment confirming that instrumental initiation of penal-fiscal proceedings cannot constitute a premise for effective suspension of the running of the limitation period.
In the case, the tax authority followed a common practice, i.e. in the course of tax proceedings, it initiated proceedings under the Fiscal Penal Code (a few weeks before the statute of limitations expired), after which it took virtually no action during the course of the Fiscal Penal Code case. Although such actions by the authorities have been widely criticized, administrative courts in the past have usually confirmed that they are allowed and effectively suspend the running of the statute of limitations.
However, in our case it was different. the Provincial Administrative Court in Warsaw, hearing a complaint against a tax decision, confirmed that the action of the authorities was incorrect and violated, among others, the principle of trust (III SA/Wa 3823/16). However, the authority appealed against this verdict to the Supreme Administrative Court claiming that it was incorrect and that the WSA had no grounds to assess the “reasons” for initiating the Fiscal Penal Code proceedings.
After we took further actions and submitted additional arguments, the tax authority finally agreed with the position of ALTO experts and withdrew the filed cassation appeal. By decision of 27 February 2020 the Supreme Administrative Court discontinued the proceedings, and therefore the favorable judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court became final and binding.
We are very proud of the outcome of his case, especially as it is one of the first judgments in which the Court – when assessing the effectiveness of the initiation of Fiscal Penal Code proceedings – went beyond the strictly literal wording of the provision and referred to its purpose / function. This favorable judgment of the Court was issued long before the Supreme Administrative Court adopted a resolution on the subject (I FPS 1/21).
The team representing the Client during the case consisted of: Paweł Fałkowski, Łukasz Kalisz and Dominik Niewadzi.
Check how we can help your company!
ContactInvolved in the project:
You may be interested:
Case studies:
Tax
200% write-off under R&D relief vs. an individual interpretation
Knowledge base:
Tax
A range of distinctions in the ITR World Tax and ITR World TP 2024/2025 rankings
The recently announced results of the ITR World Tax and ITR World TP 2025 rankings have brought us distinctions in three categorie...
Read moreTax
Tomasz Wagner strengthens the tax advisory service line at ALTO as a new Partner
Even as summer draws to a close, we can confidently say it has been an exceptionally dynamic period at ALTO, marked by numerous ch...
Read moreWhy ALTO?
At ALTO people are the key. It is them who, thanks to their knowledge and experience, are able to provide comprehensive support in implemented projects, taking care of the highest quality of services, therefore ensuring a sense of comfort and safety to our clients.
We act globally
We are a member of Allinial Global - an association of independent advisory and accounting firms leveraging the global and local knowledge and experience of 38,000 outstanding professionals from more than 260 renowned firms in 107 countries.
13+ years of experience
Our long-standing presence on the market allows us to look at the business from a cross-sectional perspective - we know what to do and how to do it to support you in achieving your goals.
150 people in the team
A constantly growing group of experts can contribute to the success of your company.
10,000+ cases
We help in both everyday aspects of running a business and in emergencies.